Business professors began to teach and write about social responsibility during the

Occasionally, a student will list the proverbial advice to write to your congressperson but when asked how many have actually done that, only one or two respond, indicating it was not part of their education. While "participatory democracy" is lauded in educational contexts, it is not what students are learning. Why should citizenship be viewed in a global context?

Business professors began to teach and write about social responsibility during the

One can easily concoct imaginary situations in which it would be inadvisable, even immoral to do so [ The Responsibility of Intellectuals: I don't feel that they deserve a blanket condemnation at all.

There are many things to object to in any society. But take China, modern China; one also finds many things that are really quite admirable.

But I do think that China is an important example of a new society in which very interesting positive things happened at the local level, in which a good deal of the collectivization and communization was really based on mass participation and took place after a level of understanding had been reached in the peasantry that led to this next step.

Skinner's Verbal Behavior" in Language, 35, No. Summation by Noam Chomsky: Rereading this review after eight years, I find little of substance that I would change if I were to write it today. I am not aware of any theoretical or experimental work that challenges its conclusions; nor, so far as I know, has there been any attempt to meet the criticisms that are raised in the review or to show that they are erroneous or ill-founded.

Skinner's Verbal Behavior ," in Leon A. Jakobovits and Murray S.

business professors began to teach and write about social responsibility during the

I'm of course opposed to terror, any rational person is, but I think that if we're serious about the question of terror and serious about the question of violence we have to recognize that it is a tactical and hence moral matter.

Incidentally, tactical issues are basically moral issues. They have to do with human consequences. And if we're interested in, let's say, diminishing the amount of violence in the world, it's at least arguable and sometimes true that a terroristic act does diminish the amount of violence in the world.

Hence a person who is opposed to violence will not be opposed to that terroristic act. Noam Chomsky interviewed by William F.

Group: Cities can grow with cooperation

Does anyone know the context of the following Noam Chomsky quote about violence? After the first International Days of Protest in October,Senator Mansfield criticized the "sense of utter irresponsibility" shown by the demonstrators. He had nothing to say then, nor has he since, about the "sense of utter irresponsibility" shown by Senator Mansfield and others who stand by quietly and vote appropriations as the cities and villages of North Vietnam are demolished, as millions of refugees in the South are driven from their homes by American bombardment.

He has nothing to say about the moral standards or the respect for international law of those who have permitted this tragedy. I speak of Senator Mansfield precisely because he is not a breast-beating superpatriot who wants America to rule the world, but is rather an American intellectual in the best sense, a scholarly and reasonable man -- the kind of man who is the terror of our age.

Perhaps this is merely a personal reaction, but when I look at what is happening to our country, what I find most terrifying is not Curtis LeMaywith his cheerful suggestion that we bomb everybody back into the stone age, but rather the calm disquisitions of the political scientists on just how much force will be necessary to achieve our ends, or just what form of government will be acceptable to us in Vietnam.

What I find terrifying is the detachment and equanimity with which we view and discuss an unbearable tragedy. We all know that if Russia or China were guilty of what we have done in Vietnam, we would be exploding with moral indignation at these monstrous crimes.

The war is simply an obscenity, a depraved act by weak and miserable men, including all of us who have allowed it to go on and on with endless fury and destruction - all of us who would have remained silent, had stability and order been secured.

Search form

What can one say about a country where a museum of science in a great city can feature an exhibit in which people fire machine guns from a helicopter at Vietnamese huts, with a light flashing when a hit is scored?

What can one say about a country where such an idea can even be considered? You have to weep for this country. No less insidious is the cry for 'revolution,' at a time when not even the germs of new institutions exist, let alone the moral and political consciousness that could lead to a basic modification of social life.

If there will be a 'revolution' in America today, it will no doubt be a move towards some variety of fascism. We must guard against the kind of revolutionary rhetoric that would have had Karl Marx burn down the British Museum because it was merely part of a repressive society.

It would be criminal to overlook the serious flaws and inadequacies in our institutions, or to fail to utilize the substantial degree of freedom that most of us enjoy, within the framework of these flawed institutions, to modify them or even replace them by a better social order.

One who pays some attention to history will not be surprised if those who cry most loudly that we must smash and destroy are later found among the administrators of some new system of repression.

He will not only oppose alienated and specialized labor and look forward to the appropriation of capital by the whole body of workers, but he will also insist that this appropriation be direct, not exercised by some elite force acting in the name of the proletariat. From Theory to Practice, It is the fundamental duty of the citizen to resist and to restrain the violence of the state.

Against the Crime of Silence: Simon and Schuster, If we try to keep a sense of balance, the exposures of the past several months are analogous to the discovery that the directors of Murder, Inc.

Reprehensible, to be sure, but hardly the main point. Personally I'm in favor of democracy, which means that the central institutions in the society have to be under popular control.When Kurt Luther walked into Pittsburgh’s Heinz History Center in to attend an exhibition about Pennsylvania during the Civil War, he didn’t expect to be greeted by his great-great-great.

Texarkana Gazette | Texarkana Breaking News

The development of social media started off with simple platforms such as Unlike instant messaging clients, such as ICQ and AOL's AIM, or chat clients like IRC, iChat or Chat Television, was the first online business that was created for real people, using their real names.

The first social networks were short-lived, however, because their users lost interest.

business professors began to teach and write about social responsibility during the

Contents of this volume: From the Director. Main Article: "Education for Global Citizenship and Social Responsibility" by Julie Andrzejewski & John Alessio Reponse to Global Citizenship by Richard Brosio. At the Ford Foundation, where she began work last year as the Director of Creativity and Free Expression, Elizabeth Alexander shapes and directs grant-making in arts, media and culture.

She guides efforts to examine how cultural narratives affect and shape social movements and how media and the arts, including film and visual storytelling, can . The workforce is changing as businesses become global and technology erodes geographical and physical organizations are critical to enabling this transition and can utilize next-generation tools and strategies to provide world-class support regardless of location, platform or device.

While this can sound dismissive, she makes an important point. Distinguishing between the malefactors, the clueless and the teachable can be crucial.

Noam Chomsky - Wikiquote